Jean Baudrillard on Watergate, The Rule of Law, and The Monstrous, Unprincipled Undertaking of Capitalism

By Omar Baig (originally published on The Mantle)

In “The Procession of Simulacra,” Jean Baudrillard made the following points on Watergate and the nature of political scandals:

  1. Scandal operates along an artificial perimeter that mediates the reality inside (i.e. the facts of the scandal) and outside the scandal (i.e. the denunciation of these facts, paid as “homage to the law”).
  2. There is no “reality” either inside or outside of the artificial perimeter of scandal. We want to bear witness to the scandal as something rare or exceptional, as opposed to the rational outcome of politics as usual or as the morally indifferent expression of capitalism.
  3. Under this crisis, we desperately try to “regenerate a moral and political principle” that will allow us to denounce the scandal without having to denounce the nature of politics or capitalism that underlies it.
  4. Thus Baudrillard claimed, “Capital, which is immoral and unscrupulous, can only function behind a moral superstructure, and whoever regenerates this public morality (by indignation, denunciation, etc.) spontaneously furthers the order of capital [by obscuring its nature with displays of public morality].”
  5. The Left wanted Watergate to be the quintessential scandal, because it above all succeeded in “the reinjection of a large dose of political morality on a global scale.” They needed this “successful” reinjection to affirm their notions of the rule of law and its necessity in serving and maintaining justice: “hoping that capital will fall for this phantasmagoria of the social contract and fulfill its obligation towards the whole of society.”
  6. Baudrillard, however, stressed that Watergate could never be the scandal the Left hoped for: because “capital doesn’t give a damn about the idea of the contract which is imputed to it — it is a monstrous unprincipled undertaking, nothing more. Rather, it is ‘enlightened’ thought which seeks to control capital by imposing rules on it.”

Baudrillard made these grim points in the section “Political Incantations,” which the proceeding “Moebius-Spiralling Negativity” doubled down on. At first it seems like Baudrillard is proposing a constant back and forth or dialectical relationship between the Left and the Right: “the work of the Right is done very well, and spontaneously, by the Left on its own […] For the Right itself also spontaneously does the work of the Left. All the hypotheses of manipulation are reversible in an endless whirligig.” The Left and the Right become interchangeable in the precession of the model, in which one forms the axis of the other, and vice-versa, until “facts no longer have any trajectory of their own, they arise at the intersection of the models; a single fact may even be engendered by all the models at once.” In the age of spin, all hypotheses on manipulation become plausible.

The Left looked toward Special Counsel Robert Mueller for hope, “by putting an arbitrary stop to this revolving causality [so] that a principle of political reality can be saved.” The Left looked toward impeachment to regenerate our faith in a democracy that can maintain fair elections between two political parties. The Left, however, should keep rereading Baudrillard’s sixth point, until “the entire cycle of any act or event is envisaged in a system where linear continuity and dialectical polarity no longer exist, in a field unhinged by simulation, then all determination evaporates, every act terminates at the end of the cycle having benefited everyone and been scattered in all directions.”

While this might sound like mystical, postmodern nonsense, the point remains: even if Donald Trump were to be impeached, and these scandals resolved themselves favorably, the underlying problems that allowed for him to get elected will still remain. Further, if there truly is something to the idea of economic anxiety and low information voters in connection to this president’s election (as something distinguishable from racism), then the implementation of significant reforms to capitalism (like a universal basic income, free higher education, and a transition to renewable energy) may precipitate alternative paradigms for politics and governance to Baudrillard’s precession between the Left and Right as we presently conceive and represent it. The root problems will not simply disappear with the end of Trump’s presidency.

Omar Baig is a philosopher and art critic from the Washington D.C. area. *No chickens were caged in the taking of this meta profile picture

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store